Every “90% win rate” video, run through years of real price data with honest costs. It takes a few minutes.
Works with YouTube, TikTok, X, Instagram and Reddit.
0
videos autopsied
0
trades simulated
0
years of 1-minute data
0
claims checked
0
survived the screen
| result | video | market | winning trades: claimed → real | $ per trade* | trades | account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOSES MONEY | How to Avoid False Breakouts (My Secret Technique)TradingLab | ETHUSDT | none→35% | −$5.76 | 3,116 | |
| LOSES MONEY | 🔴 🏆 (9 Wins Out of 10)... This 90% WIN RATE Scalping Strategy Should Be IllegalTrader DNA | XAUUSD | 90%→5% | −$3.83 | 128,352 | |
| LOSES MONEY | The 1-Minute Fibonacci Scalping Strategy (That Actually Works)The Moving Average | EURUSD | none→32% | −$1.35 | 113,006 | |
| LOSES MONEY | "BEST MACD Trading Strategy [86% Win Rate]" Tested 100 Trades Full ResultsTrade Pro | BTCUSDT | 55%→39% | −$13.34 | 844 | |
| LOSES MONEY | My Moving Average Strategy will make you PROFITABLE INSTANTLYBrad Goh (The Trading Geek) | XAUUSD | none→46% | −$3.18 | 1,208 | |
| LOSES MONEY | XAUUSD Scalping StrategyThe Moving Average | XAUUSD | none→31% | −$3.29 | 4,374 | |
| LOSES MONEY | Most Effective Stochastic + RSI + MACD Trading Strategy (Proven 100x)Data Trader | EURUSD | 56%→40% | −$1.96 | 1,557 | |
| LOSES MONEY | EASY Scalping Strategy For Daytrading Forex (High Winrate Strategy)Data Trader | GBPUSD | none→36% | −$1.89 | 13,368 |
* dollars made or lost per trade on a $10,000 position, after trading costs. Green = a profit that passed our checks. Black = a profit we could not tell from luck. Grey = too few trades to trust.
We transcribe what is said, read the chart screenshots, and write the method down as exact rules. Then we replay those rules on years of real prices, one trade at a time, and take off the trading costs a real account pays.
Yes, and we show our work so you can catch it. Every report lists the exact rules we tested and every guess we had to make. If a rule is off, correct it on the report and we test your version. The Accuracy page shows how often our reading matches a careful human one.
Because markets drift. If stocks rose for ten years, buying at random moments also made money. We run random entries beside every strategy. If the strategy cannot clearly beat them, the rules added nothing: the profit was the market's, not the method's.
No. It means that on the history we hold, the rules beat random entries, survived higher costs, cleared a bar raised for every reading we tried, made money era by era and held when the trades were reshuffled in runs. That is the whole check, and it is a statement about the past. Nobody can certify the future.
Hover a row for the one-line reason. Click for every trade, on the chart.
Reading any published report is free. Testing a new video is free once a day without an account, and three times a day with a free account.
No. These are simulated results on historical data, published for education. Nothing here tells you to buy or sell anything.